Peter has created a second video regarding the CRU emails, this time discussing the allegations that climatologists suppressed skeptical views. Enjoy.
More Peter Sinclair
December 12, 2009 by climatesight
Posted in News and Reports | Tagged canada, climate change, climategate, copenhagen, credibility, CRU, debate, denial, global warming, media, politics, republican, science, skeptic | 11 Comments
11 Responses
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
About
Kate is a B.Sc. student and aspiring climatologist from the Canadian prairies. She started writing this blog when she was sixteen, simply to keep herself sane, but hopes that she'll be able to spread accurate information about climate change far and wide while she does so. Read more
Comment Policy
Comments on any and all posts are more than welcome. However, please abide by a few rules:
Cite your statements appropriately - peer-reviewed sources for scientific claims, primary sources for quotes/current events/etc.
Don't smear someone's reputation based on pure speculation. This includes, but is not limited to, climate scientists.
Please refrain from personal attacks on myself or other commenters. Mean comments about how much you hate this comment policy are also kind of pointless.
Any violations of this comment policy will be deleted.
-
Recent Comments
Paul Handover on How much is most? Ben Winchester on How do climate models wor… dana1981 on How much is most? Paul Handover on Breaching the Mainstream chrisd3 on How much is most? Categories
Best Posts
- A Conversation With Gavin Schmidt
- A Well-Documented Strategy
- Be Critical of Critics
- Don't Listen to the Newspapers
- Essays CAN be Enjoyable!
- Extinction and Climate
- Global Surface Temperature Change
- How do Climate Models Work?
- How to Prove Global Warming Wrong
- Manufacturing Doubt
- Mind the Gap
- Overlap
- The Real Story of Climategate
- What Ben Santer Has To Say
- What if the IPCC is Wrong?
Climate Blogs
Climate Communication
Climate Science
[inflammatory]
Nice! Well done, Peter! Thanks for the link, Kate!
Business students are taught to regard E mails in the same manner as ordinary mail; to be careful in what you say because one day it will be held against you. Scientists are not, they use E mails as ordinary conversation.
I guess that will now change.
After trawling through more than ten years of E mails they found very little. Still using cherry picking and taking things right out of context as they always do, they made things sound bad for a few minutes.
Man caused global warming challenges their whole philosophy, expect them to get more desperate.
Tony O’Brien:
Emphasis mine, to draw attention to this little incident with Stephen McIntyre. He literally made one quote sound bad by hiding three subject-changing sentences from one mail behind an ellipsis. (Not the record in ellipsis-fu, but a masterfully placed deception nonetheless.)
Richard Littlemore said it best:
“Leading Republican intellectuals…”. Meow, Peter!
Funny though.
> I guess that will now change.
Yep. That will perhaps be the worst fall-out of this for climatology: email being rendered less useful for scientific co-operation by eliminating the element of candour. And undoubtedly by design.
Stefan Rahmstorf writes in his researcher diary for 8.12 about the joint paper with me that had appeared just the day before:
So begann eine Korrespondenz mit dem mir bis dato unbekannten Kollegen, die inzwischen auf über tausend Mails angewachsen ist, und die letztlich in der gestern erschienenen Studie mündete.
A thousand emails! And we’ve never met. I just know for a fact that our paper wouldn’t have gone anywhere if the both of us had had to constantly look over our shoulders while writing these mails. Can you say ‘chilling effects’?
[citations needed]
[inflammatory]
John Stewart’s Daily Show tackles the “debate”. Very funny as usual.
http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/257989/mon-december-14-2009-sigourney-weaver
As ClimateSight is a Canadian blog, videos from TheDailyShow.com (and ColbertNation.com) are unavailable. For us Canucks, we’ve got the option of digging through the grotesquely-designed TheComedyNetwork.ca site, or cheating a bit using headers.
If you’re running Firefox, install this add-on. Once it’s installed, go Tools | Modify Headers, selecting “Add” from the drop-down. Enter “X-Forwarded-For” in the first box, “12.13.14.15″ in the second, and leave the third box blank. Save, then go into the configuration and check “Always on.” This will allow videos from those sites and a handful of others to ignore region-specific blocking – it’s not universal (for instance, I haven’t figured out how to bypass restrictions on PBS.org, which has several documentaries I’ve been trying to see available online but restricted to US viewers) but it will work for Viacom sites.
(I haven’t yet found a Chrome add-on for the same effect, sorry. And if you’re using Internet Explorer, get another browser.)
[inflammatory]